Saturday, October 3, 2015

The 'Illusive' Social Justice Under Constitution of India




Bharat Ratna Babasaheb Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the Chief Architect of Constitution of India, is the man of millennium for social justice, in the sense that he became the deliverer of or the Messiah of the Dalits, the erstwhile untouchables, Other Backward Classes (OBCs), and women, constituting 95% of Hindu population. That big segment of population had been forced to live at a sub-human level from time immemorial, under caste system, sanctioned by Hindu scriptures. He was the man of millennium for social justice, since he was the first man in history to successfully lead a tirade of securing social justice to the vast sections of Indian humanity, with the help of a law, which practically repealed the concerned portions of Hindu scriptures.

Social justice denotes the equal treatment of all citizens without any social distinction based on caste, colour, race, religion, sex and so on. It means absence of privileges being extended to any particular section of the society, and improvement in the conditions of backward classes (SCs, STs, and OBCs) and women. Social Justice is the foundation stone of Indian Constitution. Indian Constitution makers were well known to the use and minimality of various principles of justice. They wanted to search such form of justice which could fulfill the expectations of whole revolution. Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru put an idea before the Constituent Assembly
 
“First work of this assembly is to make India independent by a new constitution through which starving people will get complete meal and cloths, and each Indian will get best option that he can progress himself.”

Social justice found useful for everyone in its kind and flexible form. Although social justice is not defined anywhere in the constitution but it is an ideal element of feeling which is a goal of constitution. Feeling of social justice is a form of relative concept which is changeable by the time, circumstances, culture and ambitions of the people. Social inequalities of India expect solution equally. Under Indian Constitution the use of social justice is accepted in wider sense which includes social and economical justice both. According to Chief Justice Gajendragadkar.

“In this sense social justice holds the aims of equal opportunity to every citizen in the matter of social & economical activities and to prevent inequalities”.

The Constitution of India has solemnly promised to all its citizens justices-social, economic and political; liberty of thought expression, belief, faith and worship; equality of status and of opportunity; and to promote among the all fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the nation. The Constitution has attempted to attune the apparently conflicting claims of socio-economic justice and of individual liberty and fundamental rights by putting some relevant provisions.

Article 19 enshrines the fundamental rights of the citizens of this country. The seven sub-clauses of Article 19(1) guarantee the citizens seven different kinds of freedom and recognize them as their fundamental rights. Article 19 considered as a whole furnishes a very satisfactory and rational basis for adjusting the claims of individual rights of freedom and the claims of public good.

Articles 23 and 24 provide for fundamental rights against exploitation. Article 24, in particular, prohibits an employer from employing a child below the age of 14 years in any factory or mine or in any other hazardous employment. Article 31 makes a specific provision in regard to the fundamental right to property and deals with the vexed problem of compulsory acquisition of property.

Article 38 requires that the state should make an effort to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice social, economic and political shall inform all the institutions of national life. Article 39 clause (a) says that the State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes, or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities.

Article 41 recognizes every citizen’s right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness & disablement and in other cases of undeserved want. Article 42 stresses the importance of securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief. Article 43 holds before the working population the ideal of the living wage and Article 46 emphasizes the importance of the promotion of educational and economic interests of schedule castes, schedule tribes and other weaker sections.
 
The social problem presented by the existence of a very large number of citizens who are treated as untouchables has received the special attention of the Constitution as Article 15 (1) prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. The state would be entitled to make special provisions for women and children, and for advancement of any social and educationally backward classes of citizens, or for the SC/STs. A similar exception is provided to the principle of equality of opportunity prescribed by Article 16 (1) in as much as Article 16(4) allows the state to make provision for the resolution of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the state, is not adequately represented in the services under the state. Article 17 proclaims that untouchability has been abolished & forbids its practice in any form & it provides that the enforcement of untouchability shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law. This is the code of provisions dealing with the problem of achieving the ideal of socio- economic justice in this country which has been prescribed by the Constitution of India.

The social justice scenario is to be investigated in the context of two streams of entitlements: (a) sustainable livelihood, which means access to adequate means of living, such as shelter, clothing, food, access to developmental means, employment; education, health, and resources; (b) social and political participation (enabling or empowering means), which is built on the guarantee of fundamental rights, and promotion and empowerment of the right to participation in the government, and access to all available means of justice, and on the basis of which “justice as a political programme” becomes a viable reality. We require therefore a study based on select illustrations of various issues relating to government policies on topics such as: (a) the right to food and water; (b) housing, which includes resettlement and rehabilitation; (c) access to education, (d) access to provisions of health and healthcare, (e) right to work, and (f) access to information and the right to communication. In short, one of the important ways in which the inquiry will proceed will be through taking stock of various forms that have occasioned the articulation of ideas of social justice. 

Governmental justice consists of various welfare schemes, law, legal literacy, administrative forms of arbitration such as tribunals, boards, courts, public interest litigation, new legal education, plus the constitutional idea of protection of weaker sections of the society and introduction of positive discrimination.

Published at Writer's Bloc, by: Shashikant, Student, Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Mumbai

5 comments:

Unknown said...

sir,
Social justice is a phrase with different connotations in different coun­tries and among different economists and sociologists.In developing coun­tries under a democratic structure, social justice means, above everything else, distributive justice or a broadly egalitarian socio-economic order. What constitutes just or unjust social system is, in the ultimate analysis, a question of moral judgement to be answered according to one's values and predilections. But, for a democrat who believes in the dignity of man and the sacredness of human personality, certain conclusions are inevitable. He cannot dispute the proposition that every child, no matter to which class he belongs, is entitled to those conditions which can help him to develop his fullest potentialities and achieve self-development and self-realisation.

Unknown said...

Sir,
What i feel regarding social justice is that if we want to provide social justice we need to recognize the need of the all fragments of the society. Now a days what is happening that when one go into the discourse of social justice he consider only deprived classes and forget about the other classes. Sir, if we consider and think only of a particular section of the society than it will be violative on the part of other classes which in itself is injustice on their part. Suppose if there are two boys who are economically backward but one is of deprived class and other is of well being class than the treatment that will be provided by the state (especially in India) will be different and this difference will create injustice. So can we not say that the concept of social justice will be effective when it create the tendencies of injustice?

Arun B. Prasad said...

Dear Saloni and Prateek,

Really impressed by the expression of thoughts and articulation.
Keep it up

Warm Regards,
Arun

Khwaish said...

In my view the government is right when it formulates the schemes for different sections of the society following the path of positive discrimination. Positive discrimination is very necessary today as we see that the gap between the rich and poor has been widening since India got independent. Therefore, for the welfare of the unprivileged section of the society should be made sure by formulation of relevant laws . But ,the scenario is quite different today in India .No doubt that government came up with excellent laws and ideas but the factor that went missing was the proper implementation of laws and ideas . For example the reservation policy in area of education was introduced to support the then weaker sections of SCs and STs because it was assumed that the were the most deprived sections of the society ,but ,ended up in being misused by affluent and privileged section also.In my view in this law there should be an alteration made that the discrimination on the basis of caste should be replaced by the discrimination on the basis of income level i.e. only those students should get the reservation who are in real need for it i.e. if they are poor or belong to a illiterate family and the students who don't need reservation like the ones who belong to a well off family should not get the reservation because they already have the resources to afford it. Similar kind of laws are stated in the Indian constitution in article 17[Abolition of “untouchability” and making its practice in any form a punishable offence.], article 46[Promotion of educational and economic interests.],articles 330 and 332[Promotion of educational and economic interests.]and many more as stated in the above article.All these laws should only support those who really need help and not the ones who already have enough resources.


by 15bal021

Anonymous said...

Sir, to my understanding social justice deals with distribution of resources and more specifically with how these resources should be distributed within a society. And what brings social injustice, in a society is unequal distribution of wealth and resources , unfair treatment of individuals on basis of caste, race, culture or sexual orientation and moreover laws that support such segregation. When we are considering policies to allocate resources, we must not judge them based on how they benefit us personally. So any government policy can be judged as just or unjust depends on whether it is assuring the protection of "equal access" to liberties, rights and opportunities. Here, to emphasis on equal access is whether we are getting "equal opportunities" to resources or "equal access" to resources. Hence, to me social justice is about assuring "equal access to opportunities" and at the same time taking care of the least advantaged members of society. Therefore , to attain social justice, there should be an arrangement for the greatest advantage of the least advantaged.